An Appeal for Increased Volunteer Activity

Hi Everyone-

Just a quick appeal. We have just a little over a month to Madison Nonprofit Day (11 August 2011). I know many of you will help the day of the event with set-up, food pick-up, providing assistance to participating nonprofits, etc. But we also need help NOW

So regardless if you are a presenter, a host, or volunteering for a specific project, program or activity, if you are not working on something forMadison Nonprofit Day right now, and haven't in the last two weeks, we need you.  There are details of special projects to be confirmed (lots of details), there is data entry for the web (very behind), there are activities that need docents/guides, and range of promotional needs, including handing out or delivering postcards, posters and flyers to stores or at upcoming events, and more.

Our big needs right now are:  

(1) Handing out promotional materials— Art Fairs, Summer Festivals, even the Farmers Market. This is the first year that we have 1,000s of postcards, and I'd like to see them in peoples hands instead of a box in my office. Pick an event, pick-up some postcards, and be done in an hour or less;

(2) Website Updates/Content— we have bios for photographers, restaurant histories, summaries of participating nonprofits, and event and activity summaries that need to go live soon. The registration/rsvp system is set to go live by the end of next week. So if you write well and aren't afraid of using a web form to update the website, let me know and we can get you working. Your schedule is your own; and

(3) Confirmation/Logistics— events and special activities/projects are proceeding at a rapid clip, but even with all the work and detail going into them, there's a need for telephone or email confirmation of specific details (can we use photographs of your organization? do you want invitations to the photo exhibit to hand out? do you need us to pick-up food for the luncheon or will you deliver? we need your bio? we described your event/activity this way, any modifications? etc.)  Just choose a day, where you have 1-3hrs of free time and I'll send you a list of confirmations that need to happen. Your own schedule, but mostly between 8am-5pm, since it involves work related communications

So if you can help, send me an email or give me a call 608.241.3616

Thanks,

Alnisa Allgood
Organizer

P.S.: Media and Communications Folks. If you've volunteered for it, I need you to contact me IMMEDIATELY. 

P.S.S.: If you are presenting and haven't turned in your presentation title and summary, please do so.

Test PollyDaddy

I'm some text, then render my poll.  Thanks!!!

Paintings at GCC


Taken at Goodman Community Center Fitness Center

Some Thoughts… Subscriptions, Donations, Apple, Relationships and Customer Data

http://techcrunch.com/2011/02/19/apple-kill-publishers/
 
Clearly, paid subscriptions are a part of the future of all online media, whether tied to a print version or not. That’s what The Daily is all about and even AOL might one day go down that path (Tim Armstrong admitted as much on CNN). It’s part of the shift to the Subscription Economy that’s happening across not just media, but software, cloud computing, communications, consumer services, entertainment, you name it. In just the past year, as one example, my company, Zuora,has signed over $1 billion in contracted subscription revenue. —a guest post at TechCrunch by Tien Tzuo, founder of Zuora.

I was reading Tien Tzou's article at TechCrunch this morning and thinking that it was one of the few articles posted on TechCrunch that brought common sense and clarity to the table. It's a good article that makes good points. Though, I don't agree with all of those points. 

I agree, that Apple isn't trying to kill the publishing industry and that the subscription fee is to high. I think in many ways, Apple was probably trying to be fair. Everyone else pays 30%, why wouldn't publishers. It's one known fee. It's been there since the introduction of the market.

Unfortunately, the fee doesn't reflect the reality of current market where publishers make pennies on content in exchange for advertising and customer data. This is also where I disagree with the article. I think we are rapidly approaching, if not currently in, a period where business need to rely LESS on customer data.

This, I believe, is the crux of the future of online business. As a individual and as a customer, the benefit of being online is that I don't have to actually provide you my real data. This isn't like a print magazine where I needed to hand over the data so the magazine could get delivered. I can sign-up as Jane Doe and get a digital version of the magazine, publication, any type of content.

Consumers are necessarily wary about giving out their personal data, and are flocking to services that allow them the option to opt-out. The irony of the digital world is we've created "trust' vendors. If I give my data to Amazon, Apple, PayPal, or even Google Checkout then I don't have to give my data to you, your advertisers, your 3rd party affiliate relationships that I may consider the scum of the earth or at the very least, unknown parties.

This is happening even in the nonprofit world with donation processing services. For many nonprofits the life blood of a donation wasn't the initial donation but the contact data which allowed the nonprofit to contact at will, regardless of how annoying it might be, because one day, one appeal might work.

But the new world has more donors and an increase in giving, but nonprofits are still struggling to adjust, because they no longer OWN the relationship; the donor does. And the donor may say, I like this appeal enough to donate, but I don't want to hear from you again; or maybe I'll check out your website again sometime in the future.

The crux is while advertising supports numerous business models, its rarely been consumer friendly. It's aggressive. It's invasive. It's arrogant. And like the cocky high schooler, it fills with disgust mixed with an occasional attraction. It maybe pretty, but you've got to constant fend of straying hands, aggressive eyes, get your own drinks, and have planned escape routes if you get caught alone.

I use AmazonApple, similarly to how I use PayPal, JustGive, or Causes. The first two handle products from a number of vendors and that convenience is indefinable, but the service to allow me to choose if/when I want a relationship with a 3rd party vendor is priceless. 

Direct access to customers is a commodity; and yeah, maybe some companies that have it possibly don't deserve it (Facebook). But the truth is most customers don't want direct relationship with most vendors; and the world is changing so they don't have to. So the publishing business model, and indeed all advertising based business models need to change with it.

As a donor, I give more now than ever in the past, and I acknowledge that anonymity is part of the reason. I've always believed in giving. I believe its the foundation of social and personal responsibility. But the truth is, I use to limit my giving to random encounters with street urchins and a few select nonprofit organizations. Yes, I was one of those people who hide from door to door solicitors. What can I say, I'm a sucker for a sob story; I hate saying no to a good cause; my income is limited; and its far easier to hide than to say, "No I don't care about those hungry children or the environment."

Being able to use PayPal, Causes, JustGive, Network for Good, and even Amazon Donations has allowed me to be as generous as I want to be, without having to weigh the pesky issue of "Do I want to spend a lifetime on this organization's mailing list?" And trust me, its a pesky issue cause I know how persistent nonprofits can be, even after I've said, "No, no, no…"

This is true with publishers as well. Trust me, I've noticed that my once great magazine now has more ads, less content, and more begging for additional subscriber details or customer survey completions. I could be silly enough to think the money derived from this would benefit content, but really, I know better. I know you're struggling to survive on a business model that's sinking like the Titanic, and my contribution of data to you is like sticking my pinky in the gapping whole left by that damn iceberg. it may keep you alive for an extra minute, but its going to deluge, if not drown, me.

Despite popular opinion, I'm not against ads. I love a good ad and will go out of my way to watch one. I've even been persuaded to purchase a number of products that I didn't need due to them. But despite my fondness for advertising, I hate the advertising industry. I hate my television shows being interrupted. I hate pop-up ads, banner ads, moving ads, link ads, ads with sound and no volume control, ads that flash, ads that use Flash, and ads on my ads—WTF!! I went to watch your d*mn promo for your movie, TV-show, upcoming album and your making me wait 15-30 seconds to watch another ad first. Newsflash! Promos ARE ADS!!!

Deep breath.

The digital world required people we could trust, and trust became a product along with credit card processing and toilet paper. I give me data to PayPal, Apple, Amazon, and a few others so I don't HAVE to give my information to you. I'm sorry. I may think your nonprofit is doing great things; I may think that you have a really good product, but I'll need some romance before departing with my digits.

I don't always mind if they have access to aggregate data—my age, my city, the fact that I like Ivory soap. But my contact data is my new handshake; only offered when I desire or the situation absolutely demands it.

So while I'll agree that 30% is too much for Apple to be taking for subscriptions (I recognize dead profit margins when I see them), I also say my customer data is too much for publishers to be demanding. If I wanted you to have it, you'd probably already have it by now. And when I want you to have it, I'll give it to you. So stop telling me I owe you because you took me out for dinner and drinks.

Social Media Strategy & Implementation Take Aways

These are a few of the things I took away from Tuesday's MadTech: Social Media Strategy & Implementation for Nonprofits and Cause Marketers workshop lead by Bryan Bliss. A lot of things were covered, but I enjoy focusing on a few things that can be done or explored immediately. To that regard, my focus was split thinking about tools and tactics & attitudes and actions.

Attitude & Actions
Let's start with Attitude & Actions. I consider attitudes and actions things that can be pondered, played with, but also used immediately. In general, I'm a pragmatic person, but I greatly value impulse. Not the fool heartedness generally associated with impulsiveness, but the mechanics of motion, momentum, the force, will and or desire to change things. Impulse gets things done; and I like ideas that are readily converted to impulse.

The idea and concept of being generous, as well as the ideas around participate and adapt are two that stood out for me. They're worth exploring, thinking about, and spending time testing them; but they are also impulsive. 

Be Generous

If you've participated in any social media workshop you've probably heard this message before. But I frequently hear people who don't quite understand what it means. When you're thinking, "I need to gain followers. We need more people to like us. We need donations for our annual appeal." It's very hard to think about anything other than how your giving will get you closer to your current needs. It's hard, but think of your two biggest goals or reasons for using social media, and sit them on table. It's a form of letting go. You know they are there, but you need to lesson your focus on them.

Let's just say it, "It's hard to be generous, when your every thought is focused on will this get me a new follower? donor? fan?"  So sit it on the table. Let it go, but keep it where its visible and easy to revisit. Interact with your social media friends, fans, and followers, the way you would with the smiling stranger who you met when coming out of a coffee shop, on a gorgeous sunny day and after that first sip of coffee or tea. Smile and say, "Hi" or "Good Morning" or "Gorgeous Day".  

Being generous in social media space is the same as being generous in real life. A smile and a nod, is generous but minimal. A smile and a verbal response, "Good Morning" is the next level of generosity; and so on. So start simple. If you're on Twitter or Facebook give a greeting. "Happy Tuesday folks! Today I'm hoping to…"  This is a basic level of generosity. This is just an announcement to the world. But at least once a day, also try to be generous to a specific individual. It doesn't matter who, but greet someone specifically. Comment on a post or just tell them you enjoy their posts in general. This is another level of generosity, and if practiced daily becomes easy and spills over into your regular life. I only see good in that.

The next level of generosity can also be a big boon for increasing your posting frequency—share. Link, retweet, comment, share. It's pretty simple, are you reading an article in the New York Times or Wisconsin State Journal that you like, dislike, it says something interesting? Link to it. Tell people about it. These things can be quick and to the point

I'm reading about road risk for Madison bicyclists online at CapTimes [shortlink]. I agree with suggestions.

This type of sharing, eventually gets you to a point where being generous becomes normal. You start thinking, "others might be interest". They may want to know. You become a resource, because now when you consume information, you're also thinking about giving that information to others who might find it useful.

This is generosity. Not only are you become a resource of information, but your quietly promoting other services or brands and those people, organizations, brands will start to take notice. Did you ever notice that generally when you smile at someone, they smile back? It's almost reflex. And that's true with generosity. Stop thinking about what you can say to gain followers and just be generous of yourself. The followers and fans will follow. Obviously, there's still things you can do to specifically focus on growth. But mostly they should be used infrequently, because they can cause fatigue or distrust. But generosity can be used all the time. Greet the day. Speak to someone. Share things that interest you. Three basic levels of generosity that are easy to do, and can be used daily.

So go ahead, "Smile." online.

Participate and Adapt
An interesting idea and one that I think requires further consideration from nonprofits and cause marketers is the idea of adaptation. Adaptation is not co-opting a movement or activity, it's thinking of creative ways to support a cause or action, that also works to benefit your organization. For example, in the workshop we talked about the recent National Coming Out Day, 11 October 2010. For the day, the Human Rights Campaign had a campaign running on Facebook that had people posting status updates that read like:

My Name is a straight ally/gay/lesbian and today is National Coming Out Day. I'm coming out for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality because it's 2010 and you can still be fired from your job in 29 states for being lesbian, gay or bisexual and in 38 states for being transgender. Donate your status and join me by clicking here: http://bit.ly/9oFuF9

I have no idea how successful the campaign was for HRC, but it seemed highly visible to me on Facebook. The question asked was is it possible to use a potentially viral campaign as such to gain visibility for your organization. In this case, we discussed Madison's Outreach. The HRC campaign was great, but its a national campaign and doesn't tie people back into local resources. One of the ideas was for Outreach to encourage friends and supporters to participate in the campaign, but slightly modify the message.  For example, the new message might say something like this:

My Name is a straight ally/gay/lesbian and today is National Coming Out Day. I'm coming out for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender equality; support equality locally learn more about local resources through Madison Outreach. Donate your status and join me by clicking here: http://bit.ly/9oFuF9

The message keeps the primary components of the campaign, but adds a local component. Things like this can benefit both the national campaign, by adding participant numbers, while helping increase visibility of a local organization, service or event.

I like this. I procrastinate to the full extent allowable by law, rent, and or friends—not necessarily in that order; but I like 'doing things'. I'm a big believer in learning through doing, and feel that if you want to learn how to get people active and participating in things, well then you need to be active and participating in things. Following that philosophy, then the idea is when you participate in a viral campaign like the HRC National Coming Out Day campaign, there are things for you to learn.

Participation can be casual or lead to action. Just look at the two examples above. The first is basic participation, which is a great accomplishment within itself. But the second is action. Converting impulse to action is still just as magical today as it was when the combustion engine was invented; and in many ways so much harder. 

Participation in the HRC campaign can be impulsive. The campaign was designed to go viral, and therefore makes it easy to participate. You click a button and you've donated your status blanket message. Spend an extra second and you can customize the message for your gender and sexual orientation. The message itself encourages other and provides the link back to the main site for you. Impulse.

But adapting this campaign for local benefit, requires action that takes advantage of the impulse to participate. I find the 'adapt' component particularly intriguing. You can try to recreate the campaign locally (probably not a great idea). But there are many avenues or options to navigate. You want the momentum of the impulsive click to remain, but you want to get a pause in there. Asking too much will get you a 'stop' and not benefit you and may even deter people from the original campaign. So its about identifying things that fit in a very small sweet spot. Adapting the message or adding a comment.

Adapting the message is quick and easy, but you need to be care to keep the original intent, and promote the original campaign. Adding a comment could be easier, but sticks people with there choice of message (oddly enough, a massive STOP sign on the impulsive behavior road. Don't make them think.)  There's a range of exploration and playing around that can happen here, and the more online campaigns you participate in, the faster or more clearly you can spot the opportunities that they might offer.

Tools & Tactics
I admit I was hoping to get more tool examples. I think HootSuite is a good tool, but I don't use it. I also refuse to install AdobeAIR on my computer which rules out Market Samurai one of the other good tools mentioned in the workshop.

In general some of the tools of the trade include:

Social Media Dashboards
This New york Times article provides a nice summary of some of the more popular dashboards:
http://www.nytimes.com/external/venturebeat/2010/10/04/04venturebeat-4-must-have-social-media-dashboards-for-your-4163.html

Then these tools can also be considered for potential use. 
  • Ping.fm
  • HelloTxt
  • HootSuite
  • NetVibes
I mentioned that I don't use HootSuite and won't use Market Samurai due to Adobe AIR, but in general I have nothing against either tool. I personally think it comes down to methodology. There seems to be two primary classes of social interaction: a) the far and wide class; and b) the targeted class.  I'm part of the later and obviously that influences tool selection.

Far & Wide Social Media Class
The basic ideology is that you can and should hit as many of the various social media sites as possible. Managing 10, 15, or 30 social media accounts isn't all that different than managing 2 or 3, if you have the proper tools. This works well for dissemination, but I think is less successful at strengthening ties. It can be fine if you have a social media team or even if you are the social media person. 

Targeted Social Media Class
Pick a few tools or a few 'outlets' and stick with them is the basic ideology here. But if you do social media as part of your 'real' position, then it can become overwhelming. That's where a more targeted approach can be beneficial.

I'm the executive director of our nonprofit. I'm also one of those hands on E.D. I  didn't get into nonprofit technology to spend all day thinking about fundraising or project administration. I got into nonprofit technology so I could think, do, and talk about the intersection of nonprofits with technology. I love databases, websites, playing with software, hardware, learning new tools, and coming up with new ideas to explore how technology can benefit nonprofits. This means, social media is just one of about 20 plus things per day that I think about. I select a few tools, then select which I'll stick with. What makes a tool like Facebook or Twitter 'sticky' to me is my ability to integrate it into my life—both work and play.

Other Tools
  • URL Shorteners: Bit.ly, Sn.im, Ow.ly, Tiny.url etc.
  • Analytics: Google Analytics, AdWords
  • AdWords: Google Grants for Nonprofits
  • Twitter Search
  • Search (Google, Bing, Yahoo)

Analytics/Metrics
Metrics are important, not just for your boss and your funders, but for you. It's great if your being generous and sending out links and sharing items. But if your Twitter account or Facebook page is growing at 2 or 3 fans per month, its a bit daunting and can be dispiriting in the early stages of your growth and mastery of these new tools. Challenging yourself to do better is great, but sometime you need to know that maybe you're using the WRONG metrics. 

If you are on Twitter and have 300 followers and you post a link and get not a single @mention, then you don't know if the link was of interest or not. You can be despondent over the lack of @mentions or you can think about what metrics are you missing—clicks. A URL Shortening service, almost any of them, will allow you to know that, that link on Flooding got 30 clicks, but your link on H1N1 got 3.  Just knowing that people are clicking is important psychological, but can also present new opportunities for you to challenge yourself. 

You can try to increase the average number of clicks per link. Not all links are created the same, but if you've collected link click data for a month or even a couple of weeks, you can challenge yourself to move from n to (n+x).  If your average number of clicks is 10 per link, ~3%, then challenge yourself to get to 5% (15 clicks per link on average). Then challenge yourself again from 5% to 10%. Then mix it up. 10% average click though on links, and one retweet. Retweets can be hard, start playing with ways to make them happen.

Sometimes a simple ask works. End the tweet with 'Please Retweet" and it just might happen. Other times timing maybe important. Like your early morning followers are more likely to retweet than your evening followers, so make sure the message hits both crowds. 

Don't be ashamed to double post the important things—this includes link. If you posted at 7am, try posting it again at 3pm. 

There are a number of ways to get feedback about your performance, which is basically what metrics are. So track clicks, track follows, track retweets, even pay attention to @mentions (are people talking to you? why not?).

Bryan also mentioned Twitter Search. This isn't the search that's right on your Twitter page. Twitter Search is located at http://search.twitter.com and its a fabulous tool. It can be used to find information, measure conversations, follow conversations, and more. 

Google Analytics. First off, if your nonprofit has a website it should have Google Analytics tied to it. It's free and provides a impressive battery of information, most that you'll probably never have the time to fully explore. That's good. It's good because it means if there is information that you need in the future, it's probably already there in Google Analytics.

Most people start with Visits and PageViews when using a web analytics application. That's good, but challenge yourself to explore one new feature or function per week or month. Move from views and visits, to Bounce Rate and Average Time on site. These items can be incredibly beneficial in improving your website. If your Bounce Rate is high (over 90%), then you know that people come to your site and then they leave. This is even worse if you have a very low 'average time on site.'  I mean, really, even if your sites getting 1,000 hits per month, how successful is it, if 98% of the people leave within a minute of landing?

Google Analytics can also tell you what keywords people are currently using to get to your site, what articles people are finding, and where people are finding you at. 

Metrics can be hard. There are a lot of measures. But you can always start easy. Measure clicks instead of follows. Than once you've hit some click goals, take a look at follows again.  Somethings follow naturally. The more clicks your links receive, WILL have a direct effect on people following you. Same with retweets. If you reduce your Bounce Rate on your website, you'll see improvements in average time spent on site and number of visits.

Conclusion
There was a lot more to be had at the workshop, but these were my take aways and my brain is still spinning with ideas. And one of the acknowledgements was even though this was an intermediate level workshop, it may have still been too advance for some people. I definitely saw eyes glaze at terms like metrics, ROI, Cost Per Click, etc. So we will work on making sure you can better identify if a workshop will fit your skill levels. 

But thanks to everyone who came, and if I have more thoughts. I'll post those as well.

Twitter is Revolutionary! It Doesn't Mean the Revolution Will Be Tweeted

Malcolm Gladwell recently wrote an article for the New Yorker, SMALL CHANGE: Why the revolution will not be tweeted. This seemed to set of a firestorm in the Social Media community, but also in the community of nonprofits using social media; and I'm not certain why.

I think some of the response was obviously a rally against the feeling that Twitter, Facebook, and Social Media were being viciously attacked. But I stand firm in my perspective that regardless of if Gladwell loves, hates, or is ultimately disinterested in social media, his article wasn't an attack. It was researched, articulate, and mostly accurate.  A well composed article of the current benefits and limitations of social media; and yes, a sly criticism of our tendency to overstate things.

Twitter and Facebook are indeed revolutionary, but being revolutionary isn't the same as starting a revolution in activism terms. That said, I also believe less and less people care about starting a revolution so to that degree his points maybe moot. Those waiting for Clay Shirky to call Gladwell out, may have a long wait. I believe Gladwell's argument juxtapose well with Shirky's and others in the arena. We need to leave the all or nothing arguments to issues that actually deserve them, like elections and revolutions. Where you are in or you are out. Social media isn't that.

I think Gladwell, who I can't say is avid user of social media, does a very good job of defining what social media is and has accomplished. What social media has done and what is praise worthy and even revolutionary about social media is it's significantly lower barrier entrance for issues and causes. Before a donation or an action were the lowest barriers and it was hard fought to get people to do either or both.

Now days the barrier is a 'Like", a 'Retweet', a 'Shared Link', a 'Follow'. This has expanded potential audiences greatly; and if your primary goals were sharing information largely and widely, then this is great, fantastic even.

But if you're like most nonprofits or social causes, this is just a stepping stone. Yeah, it's made step one small and easiest to stand on; especially when it use to be a huge leap. This is a weak tie, and its a wonderful thing. We can enjoy it, revel it even, because its amazing and we didn't have the power to do so before.

We can or should be able to acknowledge a weak tie as a weak tie; and still be utterly proud of what we've accomplished, why it's important, how beneficial it is; and still say, "…but it's just a stepping stone; stage one or two of an action plan."

Even if the ONLY plan of action is to turn 10% of our weak ties into slightly stronger ties; that's cool. For some organizations we just need a large starting point, and people willing to perform small tasks—retweet, post a link, say thank you.

But for many organizations, we're trying to turn 2,000 followers into 20 retweets or 50 attendees or 100 members or 1000 donations—and sometimes donations will be easier than retweets and others retweets easier than donations; and its all dependent on ties—do they need to be strong, weak, or razor thin for you to use them well.

And we're learning how to use them well; and we're learning how to make stronger ties; and how to make donations both weak and strong ties; etc., etc. So why do we care if the next revolution is started via Twitter or just spread via Twitter. Acknowledging the strength and weakness of the tools we use is beneficial. Beneficial not just for the goals we are working now, but for the future revolutions. Placing Twitter or Facebook in its right place between 'you caught my interest for 1 minute on this issue' and 'you've inspired me to change my life on this issue' is a good thing. So why are so many people up in arms?

While Social Media is here for sometime, the truth is that Twitter or Facebook could be gone tomorrow, for any number of reasons. They are revolutionary tools, and they may have changed your life; but maybe they won't be the tools of tomorrow. Maybe tomorrow's tools will be better, more fantastically. Better able to convert passing interest into passionate commitment. Maybe tomorrow's social media tools will allows us to do that, exactly, but for now we're using the current tools to carefully cultivate and grow stronger ties with a larger and growing body of weaker ties. And that's good.

These people may not be willing to put anything significant on the line for the cause; but maybe we really don't need them to. Sometimes a simple 'I Like' is good enough. Good enough to persuade current funders, good enough to spread information, even good enough to find people who will be or are already more passionate. Weak ties offer a ton of potential, but they aren't strong ties.

Do Good, Well…

Google says, "Do no evil." Well, we have more stringent requirements than that, we say, "Do good, well."  
-Internal Joke at Nonprofit Tech

Last night I was honored to do a presentation for Madison's PC Users Group. They meet at Village Cohousing Community and my talk was to be about something near and dear to me—Nonprofit Tech. The presentation allowed me to verbalize some new thoughts and ideas that have shaped and shifted Nonprofit Tech and how we approach nonprofit technology. 

While we are in awe of all the good that Google actually does do, our joke is also somewhat of a motto. It's not satisfactory to cause no harm or do no evil; we believe in aggressively doing good. From the smile to your co-worker to the helping hand to the elderly couple down the street, doing good for me and in extension Nonprofit Tech has shifted past just providing friendly and affordable service to inspiring, in word and deed, for everyone to do better. We still care for the organizations, groups, and people who provide care for you; but we've grown to really examine and explore how communities effect how successful people and organizations are at accomplishing 'public good'. 

"Do good, well!" is a shorthand for what inspires us to be better—civility, integrity, service, respect, responsibility, and restraint. 

Talking about how Nonprofit Tech differs in Madison, from what we do elsewhere honed in recent changes. From running or being actively involved in community groups, especially the User Group movement with MadTech: Madison Nonprofit Technology Group, and Open Everything Madison, to organizing community events such as Madison Nonprofit Day. We've also started focus on providing broad based services, such as the upcoming, Madison Nonprofits (www.madison-nonprofits.org) a website that aggregates news, information, jobs, events, etc. from nonprofit and public organizations in the Greater Madison Area. These things are physical manifestations of our change from taking care of individual organizations to responding to the need to support and care for those organizations within the context of their communities.

We believe! We believe in nonprofits, service, civility and the ability for technology to transform. Last night was a good reminder of that.

I Love Tweetage Wasteland

I must to confess to once again, loving a blog. Sure I've loved other blogs in my younger days, when all you had to do to win my love was impress me once or twice and allow me to post a comment. But after frequent betrayal—theirs and my own; the wonderment died and it was just another new blog; sometimes good, sometimes bad. 

But Tweetage Wasteland has changed that. How can you note love this statement…

I wanted to quickly fire up the on-screen keyboard and start making 140 character pronouncements about what this device means for the future of newspapers, magazines, gaming, movies, television, computing, reading, writing, communicating and life itself, but then I realized it had already been out in the marketplace for nearly fifty-one minutes. It was way too late to still have a meaningful opinion on any of these topics.
by Tweetage Wasteland, I Kissed An iPad and I Liked It 

He's funny, irreverent, and emotionally captivating; and him and his wife's experience with the iPad had me laughing.

Yes, my laptop knows who I'm taking to bed tonight as well. 

About


Facebook